There's been a lot of hype about HDR or HDRi lately, which is principally designed to get the photographer/artist to waste time and money. The reality is that the HDR look can be achieved without bracketing multiple exposures, using raw images or buying any hdr software.
HDR is indistinguishable from psuedo HDR, especially when images are adjusted in 8-bit PS mode and where most viewers are using 6-bit, 262,144 dithered color, LCD tn film panels. Even when printed on an Iris for the museum, 99.99% would have no clue if you shot in raw or jpeg and/or if it was true hdr or used process filtering (The other 0.01 % are you and those you told).
This also reminds me of the old RAW is better than a high quality jpeg myth, and why all 3d graphics are actually just high contrast 2d. Coming soon, new and improved cameras to make your current tech obsolete, see Computational Photography.
My art work here is licensed under the Creative Commons
and is free to use for blogs, web pages, prints, etc. All I ask is attribute the work to me in a byline e.g. "Image by AZRainman.com"
The Cinematic Country
-
Thanks Balog! Justin Balog posted a nice review of the Lightroom 4 presets
— thanks for that Justin! Glad you are enjoying them. I’m about to send out
a FR...
OK....... just a thought, is all
-
Octopus said I could come over here and post. Gosh, I hope that is all
right with everybody else. I have my own blog, OKJIMM'S EGGROLL EPORUIMand ya'll in...
Bill Cosby - A Quick Caricature Study
-
I've been very busy lately and haven't made a post in a while so I took a
little time today and did a quick caricature study of *Bill Cosby*. I've
always ...